2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1992 Subaru XT
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Subaru XT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Subaru XT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Subaru XT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Subaru XT (134 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Subaru XT should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 48 kg more than 1992 Subaru XT.
Because 1992 Subaru XT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford e-Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Subaru XT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Subaru XT (196 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1992 Subaru XT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1992 Subaru XT | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | e-Ka | XT |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1160 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |
