2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1997 Mazda MX-3

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 149 kg more than 1997 Mazda MX-3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda MX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda MX-3. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1997 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1997 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford e-Ka 1997 Mazda MX-3
Make Ford Mazda
Model e-Ka MX-3
Year Released 2000 1997
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1758 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 135 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1059 kg
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2460 mm