2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1999 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Alhambra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Alhambra would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Alhambra (115 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 437 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Seat Alhambra. (173 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Seat Alhambra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1999 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | e-Ka | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1645 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |
