2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2002 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 134 kg more than 2002 Skoda Fabia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Skoda Fabia. (126 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2002 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | e-Ka | Fabia |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1074 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |
