2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 262 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | e-Ka | F1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2210 mm |