2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 398 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | e-Ka | R2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 63 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |