2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2003 Suzuki Lapin

To start off, 2003 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. (62 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 388 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2003 Suzuki Lapin has manual transmission. 2003 Suzuki Lapin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: