2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2004 Suzuki Forenza

To start off, 2004 Suzuki Forenza is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Forenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Forenza (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Forenza should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Forenza weights approximately 17 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Forenza. (178 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Forenza. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2004 Suzuki Forenza has manual transmission. 2004 Suzuki Forenza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: