2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Korando (139 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 577 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2005 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2005 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Ford | SsangYong |
| Model | e-Ka | Korando |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1785 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
