2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 208 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | e-Ka | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1416 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |