2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2008 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2008 Nissan Navara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford e-Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2008 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | e-Ka | Navara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3210 mm |
