2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | e-Ka | Epica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
