2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2011 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2011 Lancia Musa is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Lancia Musa weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lancia Musa (200 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2011 Lancia Musa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2011 Lancia Musa | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | e-Ka | Musa |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 173 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1278 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
