2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2011 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 5008 (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Peugeot 5008 (240 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2011 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2011 Peugeot 5008 has manual transmission. 2011 Peugeot 5008 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2011 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | e-Ka | 5008 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 240 Nm |
Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2735 mm |