2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Fluence weights approximately 17 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2011 Renault Fluence has manual transmission. 2011 Renault Fluence will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | e-Ka | Fluence |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 110 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1225 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2702 mm |
