2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C4 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | e-Ka | C4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1256 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
