2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Flex (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 898 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Flex is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford e-Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Flex (346 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2013 Ford Flex | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | e-Ka | Flex |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 346 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2106 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2994 mm |