2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1675 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |