2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Econoline | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2900 mm |