2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1470 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Econoline | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Econoline | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2010 mm |
