2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3

To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Econoline 1974 Mazda RX-3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Econoline RX-3
Year Released 2000 1974
Body Type Van Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1962 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 197 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 850 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2320 mm