2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2650 mm |