2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Econoline | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Econoline | 323 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2370 mm |
