2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 999 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Econoline | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |