2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Econoline | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4690 mm |