2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1995 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Honda Integra would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1126 kg more than 1995 Honda Integra.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Econoline | 1995 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Econoline | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
