2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (208 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 638 kg more than 1999 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lincoln LS. (277 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Econoline | LS |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 277 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2910 mm |