2000 Ford Econoline vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |