2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 865 kg more than 2004 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Econoline | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | 350Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 287 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |
