2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 490 kg more than 2004 Nissan Murano.

Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Murano. (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Murano.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Econoline 2004 Nissan Murano
Make Ford Nissan
Model Econoline Murano
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Van Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 3507 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 246 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1835 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2860 mm