2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1113 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Econoline | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1212 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2990 mm |