2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |