2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econoline | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |