2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2008 Opel Meriva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 995 kg more than 2008 Opel Meriva.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Meriva. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2008 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Econoline | Meriva |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2640 mm |