2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 449 kg more than 2008 SsangYong Musso.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Musso. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | Econoline | Musso |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |