2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Acadia. (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2009 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econoline | Acadia |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3030 mm |