2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Econoline | Avenger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1496 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2766 mm |