2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Navara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3210 mm |