2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Volvo XC60

To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 432 kg more than 2010 Volvo XC60.

Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Econoline 2010 Volvo XC60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Econoline XC60
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 281 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1893 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1712 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2774 mm