2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 BMW 750
To start off, 2012 BMW 750 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 750 (400 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 255 kg more than 2012 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 750 (609 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2012 BMW 750 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Econoline | 750 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 609 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1479 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3070 mm |