2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Impala (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 712 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Impala (355 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2012 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Econoline | Impala |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 355 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2807 mm |