2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford S-Max is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2012 Ford S-Max. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford S-Max.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2012 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Econoline | S-Max |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |