2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Volvo S60

To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 596 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.

Because 2012 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (440 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Econoline 2012 Volvo S60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Econoline S60
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Van Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 440 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 2100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1729 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1864 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2776 mm