2000 Ford Equator vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 633 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Equator | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2010 mm |
