2000 Ford Equator vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 43 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Equator | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 4733 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1165 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2750 mm |
