2000 Ford Equator vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,721 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Brougham weights approximately 152 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (602 Nm) has 442 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1967 Mercury Brougham | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Equator | Brougham |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 6721 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 602 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1360 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 3130 mm |
