2000 Ford Equator vs. 1967 MG MGB
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1967 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1967 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 326 kg more than 1967 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGB. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1967 MG MGB has manual transmission. 1967 MG MGB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 1967 MG MGB | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Equator | MGB |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 149 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 882 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2320 mm |