2000 Ford Equator vs. 1972 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (36 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 728 kg more than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (40 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1972 Suzuki Fronte has manual transmission. 1972 Suzuki Fronte will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1972 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Equator | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2020 mm |
