2000 Ford Equator vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 142 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1975 Nissan Cedric has manual transmission. 1975 Nissan Cedric will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Equator | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1982 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 147 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1350 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2700 mm |