2000 Ford Equator vs. 1975 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 248 kg more than 1975 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 2101. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1975 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1975 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 1975 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Equator | 2101 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1198 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 88 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2430 mm |